W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > June 2010

Re: WD-rdfa-in-html-20100624 DTD related issues

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:15:31 -0500
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <7e2eddee-cdee-4310-b596-b7d782eb5b10@email.android.com>
For the record... this is my fault, not Manu's. I will look at it in the AM.

"Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

>On 06/29/2010 02:18 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> I noticed a few issues in WD-rdfa-in-html-20100624 while trying to validate a 
>> tiny document against the DTD.
>> 
>> First, the DTD contains a couple of syntax errors, see two first hunks of the 
>> attached diff.
>> 
>> Second, the third hunk in the attached diff is there mostly just to highlight 
>> that the example in section 2.1 "Document Conformance" of the spec does not 
>> validate against the DTD.  Value of the version attribute in the example 
>> should either be "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1//EN" or the DTD changed to 
>> match the example (which is what the diff does for illustration purposes).
>> 
>> Third, the public id in the example of appendix B ("-//W3C//DTD HTML+RDFa 
>> 1.1//EN") is not the one mentioned in the DTD, I suppose it should be changed 
>> to "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1//EN" ("DTD HTML 4.01" instead of "DTD 
>> HTML") in the specification.
>
>All good catches, Ville. Thank you. :)
>
>I'll make sure to update the DTD soon and get these changes into the
>next release of the spec and the DTD.
>
>Do you plan to deploy any HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1 documents soon, or are you
>just playing around with the DTD for now?
>
>-- manu
>
>-- 
>Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
>President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>blog: Myth Busting Web Stacks - PHP is Faster Than You Think
>http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/06/12/myth-busting-php/2/

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 01:16:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:06 GMT