W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > June 2010

Re: WD-rdfa-in-html-20100624 DTD related issues

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:41:48 -0400
Message-ID: <4C2A92CC.2020409@digitalbazaar.com>
To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
On 06/29/2010 02:18 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I noticed a few issues in WD-rdfa-in-html-20100624 while trying to validate a 
> tiny document against the DTD.
> 
> First, the DTD contains a couple of syntax errors, see two first hunks of the 
> attached diff.
> 
> Second, the third hunk in the attached diff is there mostly just to highlight 
> that the example in section 2.1 "Document Conformance" of the spec does not 
> validate against the DTD.  Value of the version attribute in the example 
> should either be "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1//EN" or the DTD changed to 
> match the example (which is what the diff does for illustration purposes).
> 
> Third, the public id in the example of appendix B ("-//W3C//DTD HTML+RDFa 
> 1.1//EN") is not the one mentioned in the DTD, I suppose it should be changed 
> to "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1//EN" ("DTD HTML 4.01" instead of "DTD 
> HTML") in the specification.

All good catches, Ville. Thank you. :)

I'll make sure to update the DTD soon and get these changes into the
next release of the spec and the DTD.

Do you plan to deploy any HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1 documents soon, or are you
just playing around with the DTD for now?

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Myth Busting Web Stacks - PHP is Faster Than You Think
http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/06/12/myth-busting-php/2/
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 00:42:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:06 GMT