W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > June 2010

Fragments in <base href>

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:15:25 +0100
To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20100622111525.4a2c9760@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
So how is the following to be interpreted?

	<html>
		<head rel=":test" resource="">
			<base href="http://example.net/#foo" />
		</head>
	</html>

I can imagine arguments in favour of:

	<#foo> xhv:test <> .
	<#foo> xhv:test <#foo> .
	<> xhv:test <> .

I think this needs clarification; not just in RDFa 1.1, but also as an
errata for RDFa 1.0.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 10:16:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:06 GMT