- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:44:50 +0100
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Following the general pattern of DOM-related APIs at the W3C, the RDFa API supports the hasFeature() method to determine whether API support is available: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-api-20100608/#widl-Document-hasFeature> A few things on this section: 1. The hasFeature() is listed as if it's an RDFa API extension, when actually it's a method provided by the existing DOM. All we're saying is that if RDFa API support is provided by a DOM then it should indicate this via the pre-existing hasFeature() method. A good prototype of how this can be written is in the DOM 2 Core, at the top of the 'Fundamental Interfaces' section: <http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/core.html#ID-BBACDC08> (Note also that the hasFeature() method is part of the DOMImplementation interface, not the Document interface. It just happens that browsers place the DOMImplementation interface onto the document object.) 2. The spec says that the feature string provided as a parameter should be "rdfa 1.1", i.e., the following should hold: assert.isTrue(document.hasFeature("rdfa 1.1")); However, hasFeature() is defined such that the feature and version number are two parameters. So what we really need is this: assert.isTrue(document.hasFeature("rdfa", "1.1")); 3. The second parameter to hasFeature() is optional, so this should also be true: assert.isTrue(document.hasFeature("rdfa")); 4. And finally, I think most people would interpret the version number as implying support for RDFa Core 1.1, rather than the RDFa API. I think this is ok, but it also means that we need to allow for 1.0 support, for backwards compatibility. Therefore, I would suggest that the following assertion should also be true: assert.isTrue(document.hasFeature("rdfa", "1.0")); Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Saturday, 12 June 2010 14:45:26 UTC