Re: Reverted HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-18)

Manu Sporny wrote:
>
> Once we have a FPWD of RDFa Core 1.1, we might as well update the
> HTML+RDFa spec to refer to that instead of the older XHTML+RDFa 1.0
> spec. I imagine that we'll fold in several of the items that we had to
> author in HTML+RDFa into RDFa Core 1.1, and do so before HTML5 goes to
> LC. So, as far as I can tell, this may be how it happens:
>
> 1. Feb-March: Work on RDFa Core 1.1, Publish FPWD RDFa Core 1.1
> 2. April: Publish HTML+RDFa Heartbeat with reference to RDFa Core 1.1
>           instead of XHTML+RDFa 1.0
>
> Thoughts?
>   
This is exactly what I had in mind.

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com

Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 11:30:24 UTC