W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Obsolete tests in RDFa 1.1 Test Suite

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:50:52 +0000
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Cc: "public-rdfa-wg@w3.org WG" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20101217145052.1146ac4d@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:38:27 -0500
Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote:

> test 0086: NO triple for a non-reserved @rel value, (negative test) –
> Now generates a triple with default vocabulary 

In XHTML+RDFa the default vocabulary is initially undefined, so this
should still generate no triple.

> test 0105: inner @rel neither CURIE nor LinkType – Now generates a
> triple with default vocabulary

Ditto.

> test 0116: Reserved word used in @property should not generate triple
> – Now generates a triple with default vocabulary

Should not generate a triple using default vocabulary, as XHTML+RDFa
has no initial default vocabulary. It should generate a triple though
owing to the term being defined in the default profile.

> test 0125: datatype XMLLiteral with other embedded RDFa, (negative
> test) – XMLLiterals are now deeply parsed

Note to self: need to implement this change myself!

> test 0142: xmlns prefix 'xml' with correct URI – <xml:test> is a
> legitimate URI
> test 0160: Undeclared prefix 'xml'– <xml:test> is a legitimate URI
> test 0162: Undeclared prefix 'xmlns'– <xmlns:test> is a legitimate URI

Not sure of the best solution for these. According to XML Namespaces,
the QName prefixes 'xml' and 'xmlns' are predefined. This needn't have
effect on how CURIEs work, but we may want to consider building them in.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 17 December 2010 14:51:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:50 UTC