W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > August 2010

Re: RDFa API - new editor's draft and ISSUE-33

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:59:32 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinthH0gW=2y8a-WSbKNDwTUyGXYAHfjuneKD7V3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Got it...thanks. :)

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> On 08/20/10 11:40, Mark Birbeck wrote:
>> 'Node' already exists as a concept in the DOM API, so we shouldn't
>> use it here.
>
> I started out this e-mail by noting that we had tentatively agreed on
> RDFNode and RDFResource yesterday, but when I took a look at the spec,
> it seems like Benjamin's edits reflected that agreement:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-api/#rdf-node-and-rdf-resource
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: WebID - Universal Login for the Web
> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/08/07/webid/2/
>
>
Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 17:00:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:07 GMT