- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:09:03 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Ivan Herman wrote: > The current RDFa 1.1 Core still lists @href and @src as part of the core RDFa vocabulary. I am not sure that is correct. @resource and @about covers all our needs, and the only reason we have them in RDFa 1.0 is to abide to HTML authoring. > I understand and I disagree. I spent a lot of time thinking about this and discussing it with Manu offline. As written, the document indicates there are attributes that might not be present in some host languages. It also says that when they are present, they have the semantics indicated. I feel this is the cleanest way to ensure that when href, src, rel, rev, profile, etc. are indeed available, they work the way we need them to. I have tried to cover this in the section on Host Language conformance and in the Processing Rules. It might be good to note which attributes are mandatory for host languages. I will do that.
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:09:36 UTC