W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2014

RE: rdftest namespace documents

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:02:46 +0100
To: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Cc: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Message-ID: <008f01cf2d51$5cde7f00$169b7d00$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:29 AM, Gregg Kellogg
> 
> I created the rdftest namespace documents [1] [2] [3], which is
> referenced from the RDF 1.1 Test Cases, and the test manifests. The
> Turtle and and JSON-LD versions are created from the HTML+RDFa, so we
> should be completely consistent. These files should go in
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ and content-negotiate to the appropriate version.
> 
> It would be good to have some extra eyes on this to be sure I haven't
> left anything out or made some other inadvertent error.

The title of the document is wrong. It says "The JSON-LD Vocabulary". If the
HTML has been created manually, we should consider re-ordering the classes.
Currently, rdft:TestEval sits there alone above a couple of ...Syntax
classes. Perhaps using nested lists would help to visualize the class
hierarchy!?

Other than that, it LGTM.

 
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/ns/rdftest.html
> [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/ns/rdftest.jsonld
> [3] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/ns/rdftest.ttl



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 09:03:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:19 UTC