W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Changes to test/implementation report URIs

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:23:44 +0100
Message-ID: <52FD1BC0.8060509@vu.nl>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'Gregg Kellogg' <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
CC: 'RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, 'Sandro Hawke' <sandro@w3.org>


On 13-02-14 20:11, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:38 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:31 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>>> On 12-02-14 21:52, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>>>> I've updated documents in mercurial to set URIs appropriate for each
>>>> spec:
>>>>
>>>> For RDF-MD, I changed
>>>> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/tests/> to
>>>> <http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-tests/>, and
>>>> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/reports/> to
>>>> <http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-reports/>.
> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Also, Guus removed the test-suite location from the header of each
>>>> spec, and replaced the implementation report with a reference to the
>>>> rdf11-testcases doc. If anything, I think I would change that to be
>>>> the generic test-suite location, and either restore the
>>>> implementation report to the actual implementation report location
>>>> for that spec, or just leave it out.
>>>
>>> OK, fine with that. So, these will be the locations I'll put in the
>> files:
>>>
>>> Concepts:
>>>   Needs to have an impl report; suggest we link to the Testcases Note
>>> Semantics
>>>   test suite: http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-tests/
>>>   impl report: http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-reports/index.html
> [...]
>>
>> +1 Works for me.
>
> Sorry, but wasn't the whole reason to create the RDF11-TESTCASES document to
> have everything in one place? So, why don't we just link from each document
> to RDF11-TESTCASES?

That was indeed my preference, but I can also live with Gregg's 
proposal.  I suggest you two reach a consensus.  Either way is fine for me.

> Also, referencing an "Implementation report" from the header of Concepts
> looks very weird to me given that Concepts isn't implementable. IMO it
> should be removed.

Pubrules requires a link to an implementation report. The Test Cases 
document is exactly the right link for Concepts, I think. See the 
explicit remark:

[[
   RDF 1.1 Concepts [RDF11-CONCEPTS] does not have a test suite and is 
not directly implemented in software; instead, it is implemented by the 
specs which build on it, including the other specs in this set.
]]

If you want to make this even clearer, you could move this to the first 
item of the list.

Guus

>
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 19:24:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:19 UTC