- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:11:35 +0100
- To: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, "'Guus Schreiber'" <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, "'Sandro Hawke'" <sandro@w3.org>
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:38 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:31 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: > > On 12-02-14 21:52, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > >> I've updated documents in mercurial to set URIs appropriate for each > >> spec: > >> > >> For RDF-MD, I changed > >> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/tests/> to > >> <http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-tests/>, and > >> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/reports/> to > >> <http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-reports/>. [...] > >> > >> Also, Guus removed the test-suite location from the header of each > >> spec, and replaced the implementation report with a reference to the > >> rdf11-testcases doc. If anything, I think I would change that to be > >> the generic test-suite location, and either restore the > >> implementation report to the actual implementation report location > >> for that spec, or just leave it out. > > > > OK, fine with that. So, these will be the locations I'll put in the > files: > > > > Concepts: > > Needs to have an impl report; suggest we link to the Testcases Note > > Semantics > > test suite: http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-tests/ > > impl report: http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-reports/index.html [...] > > +1 Works for me. Sorry, but wasn't the whole reason to create the RDF11-TESTCASES document to have everything in one place? So, why don't we just link from each document to RDF11-TESTCASES? Also, referencing an "Implementation report" from the header of Concepts looks very weird to me given that Concepts isn't implementable. IMO it should be removed. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 19:12:13 UTC