W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2013

Re: rdf semantics test suite setup

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:40:39 -0400
Message-ID: <52442B47.4080402@w3.org>
To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
On 09/26/2013 08:33 AM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> I am working on this.
>
> It's easy to identify the tests that are about semantics thanks to the 
> manifest where entailment tests are clearly identified. But a file 
> that is used for a parser test can be used for an entailment test too.
>
> Besides, the vocabularies used by the 2004 manifest are different from 
> the one used in the Turtle / NTriples / NQuads / TriG tests.
> I'm not sure what should be used for the entailment tests.
>
> Also, should we not have a document to describe all the test cases 
> (Syntaxes and semantics) and describe the manifest vocabularies (like 
> the 2004 RDF Test Cases)?
>

We should have something, but it can just be a README or a Wiki Page.   
People don't seem to be putting test documentation into spec-style 
documents any more.

          -- Sandro

>
> AZ
>
>
> Le 26/09/2013 13:59, Gregg Kellogg a écrit :
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:09 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> The 2004 test suite is described and enumerated here: 
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#testcases
>>>
>>> I've copied the tests themselves (the contents of the last test 
>>> zipfile generated) to mercurial, at 
>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/default/rdf-mt/tests/2004-test-suite
>>
>> I note that many of these tests are not of semantics, but of RDF/XML 
>> syntax or processing. It would be useful to identify which test 
>> directories are of interest for rdf-mt. I could take a stab at this, 
>> but wouldn't want to leave something that might be important.
>>
>> There are also some triples that describe datatypes being tested, are 
>> these actually used for running the 1.0 tests, or are they primarily 
>> informational?
>>
>> Gregg
>>
>>> I hope that's what you wanted.       (cf ACTION-298)
>>>
>>>         -- Sandro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 12:40:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:16 UTC