- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:33:48 +0200
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
I am working on this. It's easy to identify the tests that are about semantics thanks to the manifest where entailment tests are clearly identified. But a file that is used for a parser test can be used for an entailment test too. Besides, the vocabularies used by the 2004 manifest are different from the one used in the Turtle / NTriples / NQuads / TriG tests. I'm not sure what should be used for the entailment tests. Also, should we not have a document to describe all the test cases (Syntaxes and semantics) and describe the manifest vocabularies (like the 2004 RDF Test Cases)? AZ Le 26/09/2013 13:59, Gregg Kellogg a écrit : > Sent from my iPad > >> On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:09 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: >> >> The 2004 test suite is described and enumerated here: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#testcases >> >> I've copied the tests themselves (the contents of the last test zipfile generated) to mercurial, at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/default/rdf-mt/tests/2004-test-suite > > I note that many of these tests are not of semantics, but of RDF/XML syntax or processing. It would be useful to identify which test directories are of interest for rdf-mt. I could take a stab at this, but wouldn't want to leave something that might be important. > > There are also some triples that describe datatypes being tested, are these actually used for running the 1.0 tests, or are they primarily informational? > > Gregg > >> I hope that's what you wanted. (cf ACTION-298) >> >> -- Sandro >> >> > > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 12:34:23 UTC