- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:23:11 -0500
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 02/27/2013 11:36 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > A suggestion: > > Manu: JSON-LD should make a note about the use of bnodes to denote > graphs. That note could then hone into its special use case > scenarios e.g., where there's high velocity data with little mass. > > Steve: As already acknowledged above, you are correct about the > optimization cost to existing RDF stores and DBMS engines (it will > hit Virtuoso too) . Thus, when our engines encounter such data, we > could simply just remap the IRIs as part of our data ingestion > (insert | import) routines. That's what we'll end up doing. > > Naturally, this means tweaking existing code re. data import, > ingestion, and creation etc.. Personally, I believe we have the > ability to close out this matter without holding up the various > workgroups i.e., RDF 1.1 stays as is. JSON-LD has a fleshed out > version of the note I suggested to Manu etc.. > > Manu/Steve: > > What do you think? Sounds good and I agree. This is more-or-less what we fleshed out yesterday on the JSON-LD call: http://json-ld.org/minutes/2013-02-26/#topic-3 -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 18:23:38 UTC