W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: status of rdf:langString

From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:06:05 +0100
Message-ID: <512DDA8D.6060202@emse.fr>
To: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Le 26/02/2013 21:08, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit :
> Is rdf:langString a datatype?  It sure looks as if it should be, but it
> isn't.

It is.

>
> The OWL WG finessed this issue a different way, that was consistent with
> datatypes.  This could be done here as well (the datatype rdf:langString
> takes strings of the form "xxx@ll", ...), but maybe my proposed fix for
> the Semantics could be made visible in Concepts.

We have debated this extensively and we reach an agreement. What you 
propose was proposed then, was rejected then (personally, I was in 
favour of it).

AZ

>
> peter
>


-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 10:07:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT