- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:06:05 +0100
- To: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Le 26/02/2013 21:08, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit : > Is rdf:langString a datatype? It sure looks as if it should be, but it > isn't. It is. > > The OWL WG finessed this issue a different way, that was consistent with > datatypes. This could be done here as well (the datatype rdf:langString > takes strings of the form "xxx@ll", ...), but maybe my proposed fix for > the Semantics could be made visible in Concepts. We have debated this extensively and we reach an agreement. What you propose was proposed then, was rejected then (personally, I was in favour of it). AZ > > peter > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 10:07:28 UTC