W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: change needed in RDF concepts

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:18:53 -0600
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1B9F6352-0CFB-4179-A694-0A70CE75EF7A@ihmc.us>
To: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
We did debate this at length in a telecon. I grudgingly allowed the current phrasing, which I think is not misleading in practice. As the semantics document will have some precise results concerning skolemization and entailment, perhaps Concpets can cross-refer to that for a more exact characterization. 

On Feb 26, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote:

> RDF Concepts says:
> 
> This transformation [Skolemization] does not change the meaning of an RDF graph, provided that the Skolem IRIs do not occur anywhere else.
> 
> This isn't true.  (Well, it's sort of true if you aren't looking at the semantics, but even so it should be qualified.)
> 
> I suggest adding an "appreciably" to the statement.

I am OK with that. 

Pat

> 
> peter
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 01:19:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT