W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: change needed in RDF concepts

From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:19:45 +0100
Message-ID: <512DCFB1.8050907@emse.fr>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
CC: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
RDF Concepts already say "appreciably". You may have looked at an older 
version.

AZ

Le 27/02/2013 02:18, Pat Hayes a écrit :
> We did debate this at length in a telecon. I grudgingly allowed the current phrasing, which I think is not misleading in practice. As the semantics document will have some precise results concerning skolemization and entailment, perhaps Concpets can cross-refer to that for a more exact characterization.
>
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
>> RDF Concepts says:
>>
>> This transformation [Skolemization] does not change the meaning of an RDF graph, provided that the Skolem IRIs do not occur anywhere else.
>>
>> This isn't true.  (Well, it's sort of true if you aren't looking at the semantics, but even so it should be qualified.)
>>
>> I suggest adding an "appreciably" to the statement.
>
> I am OK with that.
>
> Pat
>
>>
>> peter
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 09:21:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT