W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:07:00 +0000
Cc: andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <9B13C280-4EC0-4259-B4DD-D37E8B99A474@garlik.com>
To: William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
On 2013-02-20, at 10:21, William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:15:37 +0000, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> said:
> 
>> I proposed the *parser* generate fragments or URIs and in fact
>> label generation is what happens in your example ... _:c14n1,
>> _:c14n2 which came from somewhere.  They are generated.  Use
>> <#g1>, <#g2>.
> 
> Are you seriously proposing that a parser for a serialisation format
> for what is meant to represent RDF ought to mint URIs?

Why not? It's legal for other RDF serialisations to do that, via skolemisation. It's logically sound, and a sensible approach to situations where you don't want to require the generating implementation to mint URIs.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris
Experian
+44 20 3042 4132
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 11:07:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT