W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Moving forward on ISSUE-21

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:23:41 +0200
Message-ID: <504DBFAD.7050007@vu.nl>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>


On 07-09-2012 18:05, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> On 7 Sep 2012, at 14:32, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> I have re-edited
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/Minimal-dataset-semantics
>>
>> to separate the issues. I have merged some of the issues where I felt that was helpful, and also incorporated Richard's extra issues. Have a look to see if I misunderstood something.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
>> If we three agree (and I have the impression we do), then we may ask the chairs to put this on the agenda next week...
>
> +1.
>
> Although we perhaps should start with another vote on the ISSUE-21 proposal we had on the table this week. As I said in [1], I am now confident that the underlying issue (When are two blank nodes the same and when are they not?) can be solved by tweaking the definitions of blank nodes and/or graph stores, regardless of the decision we take on ISSUE-21.
>

Both will be on the agenda; to be available soon (editing now)
Guus

> Best,
> Richard
>
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Sep/0056.html
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 10:24:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:51 GMT