W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: RDF WG charter and JSON-LD resolutions

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:11:32 +0100
Message-Id: <A26DC990-6609-4833-94CB-D97E33C54137@deri.org>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>

> Not advocating, just pointing out that there is an alternative that's already implemented and deployed in a couple of places.

Interesting, yes, have forgotten about this one. Ian, Tom, any thoughts on this?

Cheers,
	   Michael

--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel.: +353 91 495730
http://mhausenblas.info/

On 23 Oct 2012, at 20:32, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> On 23 Oct 2012, at 18:59, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> This also means that if this group decides to not publish JSON-LD as a
>> REC, that they'd have to come up with an alternate RDF/JSON mechanism to
>> achieve the charter requirement
> 
> The WG could revive [1], which was abandoned/shelved quite some time ago in favour of seeing how JSON-LD turns out.
> 
> Not advocating, just pointing out that there is an alternative that's already implemented and deployed in a couple of places.
> 
> Best,
> Richard
> 
> 
> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-json/index.html
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 07:12:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT