W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: RDF WG charter and JSON-LD resolutions

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:32:34 +0100
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <474AB6A9-FCBB-4AF8-866B-80120154B465@cyganiak.de>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
On 23 Oct 2012, at 18:59, Manu Sporny wrote:
> This also means that if this group decides to not publish JSON-LD as a
> REC, that they'd have to come up with an alternate RDF/JSON mechanism to
> achieve the charter requirement

The WG could revive [1], which was abandoned/shelved quite some time ago in favour of seeing how JSON-LD turns out.

Not advocating, just pointing out that there is an alternative that's already implemented and deployed in a couple of places.

Best,
Richard


[1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-json/index.html
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 19:33:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT