W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 23th 2012

From: François Daoust <francois@joshfire.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:19:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFZhi7zhWPeKY6oBneduAzrRdvaCYtYeAPN5UQrQ3Lyib+2mmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
[...]
> Agenda
>
> 1. ISSUE-168: JSON-LD Syntax document MUST utilize the RDF definitions
>    * https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/168
> 2. ISSUE-156: Compact API first expands without provided context
>    * https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/156
> 3. ISSUE-162: Base IRI used to expand @type?
>    * https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/162
> 4. ISSUE-159: Add specifying @language to expanded form
>    * https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/159

Note I also created ISSUE-166 to propose a Conformance section and
ensure consistency in the use of normative language throughout the
spec:
 https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/166
This is not entirely unrelated to the other issues at stake, e.g.
because of its possible consequences on section 3.1 JSON-LD Data Model

Francois.

>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power
> http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
>
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 08:19:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT