W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 03:24:51 -0600
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E9EA5754-A18A-4C03-938C-985AF618D1F7@ihmc.us>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>

On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:48 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> ISSUE-102: Shall we highlight Turtle's list structures as "Well-Formed Lists" in one of our Recs?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/102
> 
> 
> PROPOSAL: Define the concept “well-formed list” in detail in RDF Schema, including a nice diagram.

+1

> State that any use of terms from the collections vocabulary SHOULD be part of a well-formed list.

-1.  This is too strong. Subgraphs of a WFL graph need not be WFL, for example. For some purposes, all one needs to know is that some item is in the list somewhere: we should not make it illegal to have graphs saying just this.

> Update Semantics to remove discussion of collections in 3.3.3.

If this just means moving this stuff from Semantics to Concepts, then +1.

Pat


> Update Turtle and RDF/XML to refer to well-formed lists when introducing the respective syntax shorthands. Send an email to OWL WG comments list informing them of this and suggest that future versions of OWL do the same.
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 09:25:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT