W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Intent to close issues 125 and 192

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 20:23:49 -0500
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F8A0993F-6678-45FA-AAB4-C19548D8F72D@greggkellogg.net>
I also addressed Issue 193 [5] in some of these commits. I'll close that one too, unless you think it needs more work.

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

On Nov 9, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:

> Changes that were requested to deal with RDF conversion terminology have been commited, and I will close the issues in 24 hours unless I hear objections.
> 
> The affected issues are issue 125 Define from/to RDF algorithms in terms of standard RDF [1] and issue 192 What's a "string representation in fromRDF [2].
> 
> Issue 125 is addressed in [3] using the suggested terminology.
> 
> Issue 192 is addressed in [3] by using either "canonical lexcial form" or "expanded form". I also added the term "expanded IRI form", which can actually represent either an absolute IRI or a blank node. 
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
> 
> [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/125
> [2] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/192
> [3] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/846616d3f8fc6bffa4af31bbdd952c3bc893e56f
> [4] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/168ba91fde86eb68d58de0f911aa6873d1200865
Received on Saturday, 10 November 2012 01:24:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT