W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Sloppy inference rules

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:23:23 +0000
Message-ID: <509A44AB.1050803@webr3.org>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 30 Oct 2012, at 16:15, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> So my question to the WG is, how disastrous would it be if the RDFS inference rules were stated in terms of a 'sloppy' version of RDF with the syntactic restrictions removed, i.e. with the following grammar for triples?
>>
>> triple ::= term term term .
>> term ::=  IRI | blanknode | literal
> 
> +1

+1
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 11:24:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT