W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

ISSUE-97: propose to close the issue by doing nothing

From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:42:47 +0100
Message-ID: <50995A27.3090007@emse.fr>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Re. ISSUE-97: Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a 
vocabulary?


I suggest we close it and do nothing.


The implications of the change would be important.
If such a thing was done, all reasoners would have to be reimplemented, 
because the change adds a lot of entailments inferred from the empty graph.

Nonetheless, I made a wiki page where I put the formal definitions of 
simple-entailment, lv-entailment, rdf-entailment, rdfs-entailment and 
D-entailment when these notions are made independent from a vocabulary.

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/User:Azimmerm/RDF-semantics


Best,
-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 18:43:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT