W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Fwd: rdf:value instead bibo:content

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:00:55 -0400
Message-ID: <4FCF70A7.1040201@gmail.com>
To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I particularly don't understand why rdf:value would be used when emulating 
general n-ary relations.  Could you enlighten me?

peter

PS:  I find the example in the RDF Primer to be totally incorrect.

On 06/06/2012 10:52 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>
>
> On 31-05-2012 17:38, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>
>> Seems some are switching *to* rdf:value?
>
> [cultural open-data hat on]
>
> We've done the same in the past. Actually, rdf;value makes a lot of 
> conceptual sense in a binary data model like RDF, as nodes are relatively 
> freuntly used for n-ary relations.
>
> Guus
>
>>
>> Perhaps the property has, erm, value after all?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 15:01:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT