W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Fwd: rdf:value instead bibo:content

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:52:24 +0200
Message-ID: <4FCF6EA8.1040406@vu.nl>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>


On 31-05-2012 17:38, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> Seems some are switching *to* rdf:value?

[cultural open-data hat on]

We've done the same in the past. Actually, rdf;value makes a lot of 
conceptual sense in a binary data model like RDF, as nodes are 
relatively freuntly used for n-ary relations.

Guus

>
> Perhaps the property has, erm, value after all?
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From:* ljgarcia <leylajael@gmail.com <mailto:leylajael@gmail.com>>
>> *Date:* 31 May 2012 07:56:57 PDT
>> *To:* Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group
>> <bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com>>
>> *Subject:* *rdf:value instead bibo:content*
>> *Reply-To:*
>> bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have seen at
>> http://bibotools.googlecode.com/svn/bibo-ontology/trunk/doc/index.html
>> that bibo:content is deprecated and rdf:value is recommended instead.
>> We are working with portions of the document, e.g. sections and
>> paragraphs rather than the whole document. We need to model the
>> content so bibo:content seems to be the right property but (i) it is
>> deprecated, and (ii) it takes bibo:Document as domain.
>> Any suggestions? I find using rdf:value some inaccurate and confusing,
>> I rather to use a more specific property.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Leyla GarcĂ­a
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:bibliographic-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com>.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> bibliographic-ontology-specification-group+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com <mailto:bibliographic-ontology-specification-group+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/bibliographic-ontology-specification-group?hl=en.
>>
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 14:53:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT