W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Another try.

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:52:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFr0oYBe00VR0PvkRURf_Hxc5EGW1J4gVQQ0w6fkMJ8ASg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 22 February 2012 08:40, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> But the only vocabulary over which we have such control is W3C's vocabularies (RDF(S), OWL, SKOS, whatever). What happens with the others like dcterms or foaf? Wouldn't we still need the '+' syntax somehow

The rest of us aren't so far away. If there's something simple that
vocab managers can do to improve their compatibility with RDF5 (or
whatever we call this :) then getting in touch with DC and FOAF and
dozens of others isn't that hard.

But question is: what exactly would DC/FOAF/etc be expected to do?

Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 10:53:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:03 UTC