W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [All] Proposal: RDF Graph Identification

From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:04:16 +0200
Message-ID: <50326000.7070802@emse.fr>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Le 20/08/2012 17:14, Sandro Hawke a écrit :
> [cut]
>
> We'd just be separating the RDF semantics from the RDF model and syntax.
> It would now be okay, according to the spec, to use the RDF model and
> syntax without using the RDF semantics.

What does this change to the current situation? RDF semantics is 
separated from the RDF model & syntax (except that the word "concepts" 
is used instead of "model") and it is Ok to implement one without the 
other and this is what people actually do. Not every applications that 
use RDF have to be reasoners (RDF parsers, W3C RDF validator, RDF 
editors, some triplestores, linked data browser, etc).

Moreover, the current RDF 1.1 Concepts explains much better than RDF 1.0 
Concept what the concepts are supposed to mean. So I expect that, with 
the new specs, it will be even easier to implement the model without 
bothering about the formal semantics.


-AZ


>
> [cut]
>

-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 16:04:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:06 UTC