W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Close ISSUE-76?

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:40:23 -0500
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CF899A5A-5313-4991-AC68-BFF861FF0E48@ihmc.us>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Um... can you point out where I agreed to this? Or if a vote was taken and I missed it? 

I honestly do not see how to make sense of this idea of an 'empty' datatype, I think allowing it is quite unnecessary, is going to achieve nothing but sow widespread confusion, and I would rather not make any such change to the semantics. 

Pat

On Oct 18, 2011, at 12:33 PM, David Wood wrote:

> Hi Pat,
> 
> Can you please tell us whether ISSUE-76 [1] can be closed?  I think it is now an editorial issue in RDF Semantics.  Thanks.
> 
> This completes my action at [2].
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/76
> [2]  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/108
> 
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 21:41:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT