W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Close ISSUE-76?

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:03:27 -0400
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5BE975F8-5A31-4AF5-827A-C2D9411D45C9@3roundstones.com>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Hi pat,

I'm sorry, you seem not to have agreed - my mistake.  Please see [1] for your latest response.  Can you please discuss with Richard to see how this might be resolved?  Thanks.

Regards,
Dave

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Aug/0236.html


On Oct 18, 2011, at 17:40, Pat Hayes wrote:

> Um... can you point out where I agreed to this? Or if a vote was taken and I missed it? 
> 
> I honestly do not see how to make sense of this idea of an 'empty' datatype, I think allowing it is quite unnecessary, is going to achieve nothing but sow widespread confusion, and I would rather not make any such change to the semantics. 
> 
> Pat
> 
> On Oct 18, 2011, at 12:33 PM, David Wood wrote:
> 
>> Hi Pat,
>> 
>> Can you please tell us whether ISSUE-76 [1] can be closed?  I think it is now an editorial issue in RDF Semantics.  Thanks.
>> 
>> This completes my action at [2].
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> 
>> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/76
>> [2]  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/108
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 23:03:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT