- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:59:09 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 06/10/11 11:09, Steve Harris wrote: > On 2011-10-06, at 10:47, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> On 06/10/11 10:29, Steve Harris wrote: >>> On 2011-10-06, at 08:35, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>>> >>>> On 05/10/11 23:16, Ian Davis wrote: >>>>> I think 4.2 web crawling (or aggregation in general) is very >>>>> important >>>>> >>>>> Also I don't see it on the existing list but being able to edit >>>>> datasets at the granularity of the graph rather than the triple >>>>> is very important. i.e. It is very convenient to be able to >>>>> replace all the triples in one named graph with a new set when >>>>> doing things like web crawling. >>>> >>>> Agreed. >>>> >>>> Some words added (section 1.7, to keep the numbering stable); Ian, >>>> do feel free to refine them. >>>> >>>> This relates to 1.5 "Exchanging the contents of RDF stores". >>> >>> Agreed, on all counts. >>> >>> However I'd like it to be expanded in scope slightly to also cover >>> information derived from non-RDF pages which are being crawled (pure >>> self-interest, as this is where we get most of our data). It's >>> slightly different from a modelling point of view, as foo.html >>> doesn't typically contain any actual triples, just information which >>> cause triples to be asserted. >> >> It's a wiki ... :-) > > Indeed, but it felt a little underhand to change the focus of a use-case after people had voted for it! > > If neither you or Ian feel it's an issue, I'll add a note to it. It's better to capture it than loose it - how about adding a section/paragraph if you think it's does not warrant being "1.8" Andy > > - Steve > >>> That, in combination with “1.3 Graph Changes Over Time”, and “1.5 >>> Exchanging the contents of RDF stores” captures our most challenging >>> data representation challenges. >>> >>> - Steve
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 10:59:40 UTC