W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [ALL] 48 Hours to Prioritize Graph Use Cases

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:47:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4E8D7934.5040909@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 06/10/11 10:29, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 2011-10-06, at 08:35, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>> On 05/10/11 23:16, Ian Davis wrote:
>>> I think 4.2 web crawling (or aggregation in general) is very
>>> important
>>>
>>> Also I don't see it on the existing list but being able to edit
>>> datasets at the granularity of the graph rather than the triple
>>> is very important. i.e. It is very convenient to be able to
>>> replace all the triples in one named graph with a new set when
>>> doing things like web crawling.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> Some words added (section 1.7, to keep the numbering stable); Ian,
>> do feel free to refine them.
>>
>> This relates to 1.5 "Exchanging the contents of RDF stores".
>
> Agreed, on all counts.
>
> However I'd like it to be expanded in scope slightly to also cover
> information derived from non-RDF pages which are being crawled (pure
> self-interest, as this is where we get most of our data). It's
> slightly different from a modelling point of view, as foo.html
> doesn't typically contain any actual triples, just information which
> cause triples to be asserted.

It's a wiki ... :-)

> That, in combination with “1.3 Graph Changes Over Time”, and “1.5
> Exchanging the contents of RDF stores” captures our most challenging
> data representation challenges.
>
> - Steve
>
>
>>> On 5 Oct 2011, at 20:49, Andy
>>> Seaborne<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think that:
>>>>
>>>> 1.3 Graph Changes Over Time
>>>>
>>>> is also important.
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>> On 05/10/11 19:56, David Wood wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We would like to prioritize the use cases for named graphs
>>>>> [1] before FTF2.
>>>>>
>>>>> At today's telecon, the following use cases were deemed
>>>>> important to attendees: - 1.1 Slicing datasets according to
>>>>> multiple dimensions - 1.5 Exchanging the contents of RDF
>>>>> stores - 1.6 Versioning in SDMX and DDI - 5.2 OWL's “Ontology
>>>>> Documents” - 6.2 Reasoning over annotations
>>>>>
>>>>> Further, it was proposed to drop the following use case: -
>>>>> 4.8 Provenance Information and Data Retention ...and add
>>>>> Sandro's provenance use case [2] in place of several existing
>>>>> provenance use cases (to be determined).
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that the numbers are for reference only until the
>>>>> page is modified.  The numbers *will* change, no later than
>>>>> Friday.  The numbers in this message are from revision 1473
>>>>> [3].
>>>>>
>>>>> If you object to these changes or have others to suggest,
>>>>> please respond to this message and/or update the wiki.
>>>>> Thanks.  I will update the wiki no later than this weekend
>>>>> prior to the ftf.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Dave
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC [2]
>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-prov/2011Sep/0003.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
[3] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/index.php?title=TF-Graphs-UC&oldid73
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 09:48:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:45 GMT