W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Wording tweaks in Fragment Identifier section

From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:04:40 +0000
Cc: "Yves Raimond , RDF Working Group WG" <Yves.Raimond@bbc.co.uk>
Message-Id: <CAPqY83xev+fvY9TVzNS09xWPH=GRn=Lb4G+4OUEK+D_uq-vjqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> Gavin, you mentioned you had problems making sense of the last sentence. I changed it to:
> 
> [[
> Likewise, RDF graphs embedded in non-RDF representations with mechanism such as RDFa [RDFA-PRIMER] should use fragment identifiers consistently with the semantics imposed by the host language.
> ]]

+1

Thanks,
Gavin

> 
> Best,
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 18 November 2011 09:09:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT