W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:18:56 -0500
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1D92AFB3-6A0E-4215-A843-F241E0D40484@3roundstones.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:13, Ivan Herman wrote:

> The problem is that both the OWL and RIF are in dormant state. What this means is that if XSD Datatypes become a standard, they will both wake up, change the references in their document, maybe handle some errors, publish an edited document, and then the groups will be closed...
> 
> I am not sure that what you propose is editorial only in terms of the document. If it is not, I do no think it is that simple...
> 
> David or Guus, it would be a good idea to contact officially the RIF and OWL WG chairs on this. Cc it to the Coordination Group...

Done.

Regards,
Dave



> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ivan
> 
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 18:06 , RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
>> 
>> RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/80
>> 
>> Raised by: Richard Cyganiak
>> On product: RDF General
>> 
>> The ISSUE-12 and ISSUE-71 resolutions, which are now implemented in the RDF Concepts ED [1], have removed the distinction between plain and typed literals from the RDF abstract syntax.
>> 
>> This has a major effect on the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [2]. Parts of it are now obsolete, and the rest needs updating.
>> 
>> RDF-WG should ask OWL-WG and RIF-WG to update the document.
>> 
>> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-plain-literal/
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 18:19:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT