W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:25:13 +0100
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AFEC6E15-0E35-4227-9794-1E06524F9F4D@cyganiak.de>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
On 25 May 2011, at 09:51, Dan Brickley wrote:
> Also I'm quite curious whether it could use RDFa, ... or that might be too 'meta'.

ReSpec apparently adds some RDFa metadata if one sets a flag in the config. Not sure what exactly.

If you refer to RDFa for the content itself (the definitions of RDFS terms), I think it makes more sense to limit “machine-readable spec” material to the namespace document.

Best,
Richard
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 10:25:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:43 GMT