- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:05:34 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On May 25, 2011, at 10:51 , Dan Brickley wrote: [snip] > > I've been through the basic process with the POI WG and yeah, there's > not a lot to it - as above. We just pick a name (yes, 'rdf' is fine), > and then someone from team sends a request for a new repo to Sysreq, > ideally copying the other team and chairs so everyone's in the loop. I > suggest you just do that rather than have a consensus process for > deciding our repo name :) It can wait until this afternoon:-) > >> I guess the obvious answer to the last question is to allow for only our group to edit. Our DBWG id is 46168 > > Sounds about right > >>> 2. I assume we will do public editor's drafts. What will the IRI of the RDF Concepts draft be? > > I think we can get the basic specs into public Mercurial without > finalising all of this. > > We also need to think about managing / evolving the (currently > CVS-archived) namespace documents for RDF and RDFS. > I would expect those to stay in CVS space and we will just update those. Eric, Sandro or I can update them at any time if needed. 'If needed' is the key here: unless we add new terms (eg, a new datatype...) then those files should be o.k., though I would probably produce a turtle version for both Ivan > cheers, > > Dan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 09:03:28 UTC