- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:46:32 -0700
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 5/24/2011 3:57 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 24 May 2011, at 20:32, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >> Q2C. Does this RDF graph (written in Turtle) have one, two or three triples? >> >> <x-eg:a> <x-eg:c> "foo" . >> <x-eg:a> <x-eg:c> "foo"^^xsd:string . >> <x-eg:a> <x-eg:c> "foo"^^xsd:Name . > Two triples in the graph -- "foo"^^xsd:string and "foo"^^xsd:Name. > > Both say the same thing under XSD-Entailment. Yes > Isn't xsd:string vs xsd:Name just like xsd:integer vs xsd:byte? Two different triples, no problem. it may be odd if we effectively deprecate xsd:string for RDF (surface syntax ...) but still have subtypes lying around ...
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 23:46:55 UTC