W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18

From: David Wood <david.wood@talis.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 09:52:24 -0400
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6EFA5614-63FE-4742-BA9F-7A75543AAB43@talis.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
On May 23, 2011, at 02:05, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> On 23 May 2011, at 05:49, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Indeed, that was my immediate question reading the minutes... Do we have a resolution on the skolems (pending a s/steveH/???/ change)?
> 
> Well, there was a proposal. There was a vote that showed no opposition (except to the SteveH name which still needs to be changed, and some re-wording which Peter provided in the meantime). Guus asked me to close ISSUE-40 with a pointer to the resolution. I tried to do so, but found the resolution not recorded in the minutes.

Hmmm.  I seem to recall that Peter still had an issue with the proposal at [1] and took an action to suggest a minor change.  Does anyone else remember?

Regards,
Dave

[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Skolemization#Updated_Proposal


> 
> Looking at the minutes again, it was scribed that the chair said that we can close ISSUE-40, which implies that there was an (unscribed) resolution. I'm going to modify the minutes now to add the resolution. If anyone recalls this differently, please speak up and we'll revert.
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard
> 
> 
>> 
>> I.
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman
>> Tel:+31 641044153
>> http://www.ivan-herman.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 23 May 2011, at 04:08, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Was there a resolution on the proposal regarding ISSUE-40, or was that tabled for an un-minuted reason?
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> Lee
>>> 
>>> On 5/22/2011 4:37 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>>> Seems like Wednesday's scribe didn't find time yet to generate the minutes, so I just did it:
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-05-18
>>>> 
>>>> I recall that one more resolution was made after a vote, but it was not scribed: accept the proposal on ISSUE-40.
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Richard
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 23 May 2011 13:53:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:43 GMT