W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz

From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:51:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4DD52E6B.6040704@insa-lyon.fr>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
I have some more questions:



Q25. Is this a single triple?

     <joe> <nbChildren> "2"^^xs:decimal .
     <joe> <nbChildren> "+2.000"^^xs:decimal .

Q26. Is this a single triple?

     <joe> <nbChildren> "2"^^xs:byte .
     <joe> <nbChildren> "2"^^xs:positiveInteger .

Q27. Does the following query give <joe> as an answer, when asked 
against the previous graphs?

     SELECT ?person WHERE { ?person <nbChildren> 2 }



Regards,
AZ.

Le 19/05/2011 16:40, Alex Hall a écrit :
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Richard Cyganiak<richard@cyganiak.de>wrote:
>
>> The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz
>> ------------------------
>>
>> Let's pretend we live in the future and RDF 1.1 has just been published,
>> including this working group's attempt to clean up string literals.
>>
>> Now here's a quiz with some RDF trivia questions.
>>
>> What are the answers that you'd like to see? Please keep them short --
>> along the lines of “Yes”, “No”, “Don't care”, “Don't prefer but ok”, “Oh yes
>> please please please”, “WTF!?!?”, “Formal objection!”
>>
>> (I tried to phrase the questions in terms of user-visible behaviour and not
>> spec-internal mechanisms. I hope we can get some non-controversial test
>> cases out of this, and pinpoint where we disagree on desired behaviour. If
>> you provide responses, then feel free to add additional questions.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Q1. Does this RDF graph (written in Turtle) have one triple?
>>
>>   <a>  <b>  1 .
>>   <a>  <b>  "1"^^xsd:integer .
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>
>> Q2. Does this RDF graph (written in Turtle) have one triple?
>>
>>   <a>  <c>  "foo" .
>>   <a>  <c>  "foo"^^xsd:string .
>>
>
> Yes - I thought the whole point of this exercise was to enforce that by
> settling on a single representation for that in the abstract syntax.
>
>
>>
>> Q3. Is this be a valid Turtle file?
>>
>>   <a>  <b>  "foo"^^rdf:PlainLiteral .
>>
>
> Valid Turtle, invalid RDF.
>
>
>>
>> Q4. Is a parser allowed to unify "foo" and "foo"^^xsd:string into a single
>> form while parsing?
>>
>
> Yes, and hopefully required to.
>
>
>>
>> Q5. Is this a valid N-Triples file?
>>
>>   <a>  <b>  "foo" .
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>
>> Q6. Is this a valid N-Triples file?
>>
>>   <a>  <b>  "foo"^^rdf:PlainLiteral .
>>
>
> Valid N-Triples, invalid RDF.
>
>
>>
>> Q7. Is this a valid N-Triples file?
>>
>>   <a>  <b>  "foo"@en .
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>
>> Q8. Is this a valid N-Triples file?
>>
>>   <a>  <b>  "foo"^^xsd:string .
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>
>> Q9. Is this true in SPARQL?
>>
>>   datatype("foo") == xsd:string
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>
>> Q10. Is this true in SPARQL?
>>
>>   datatype("foo") == error
>>
>
> No.
>
>
>>
>> Q11. Is this true in SPARQL?
>>
>>   datatype("foo") == rdf:PlainLiteral
>>
>
> I hope not.
>
>
>>
>> Q12. Is this true in SPARQL?
>>
>>   datatype("foo"@en) == xsd:string
>>
>
> Probably not.
>
>
>>
>> Q13. Is this true in SPARQL?
>>
>>   datatype("foo"@en) == error
>>
>
> Don't care.
>
>
>>
>> Q14. Is this true in SPARQL?
>>
>>   datatype("foo"@en) == rdf:PlainLiteral
>>
>
> Don't care.
>
>
>>
>> Q15. Is this true in SPARQL?
>>
>>   datatype("foo"@en) == rdflang:en
>>
>
> Don't care.
>
>
>>
>> Q16. Does the literal in this RDF/XML fragment have a language tag?
>>
>>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="a" xml:lang="en">
>>    <rdf:b>foo</rdf:b>
>>   </rdf:Description>
>>
>
> Don't care.
>
>
>>
>> Q17. Does the literal in this RDF/XML fragment have a language tag?
>>
>>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="a" xml:lang="en">
>>    <rdf:b rdf:datatype="&xsd;string">foo</rdf:b>
>>   </rdf:Description>
>>
>
> Don't care.
>
>
>>
>> For each of the following pairs of statements, if the statement on the left
>> is true, then is the statement on the right true as well in a system that
>> supports datatype inference (specifically, {xsd:string}-Entailment)?
>>
>> Q18. {<a>  <b>  "foo" . } =>  {<a>  <b>  "foo"^^xsd:string . }
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>
>> Q19. {<a>  <b>  "foo"^^xsd:string . } =>  {<a>  <b>  "foo" . }
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>
>> Q20. {<a>  <b>  "foo" . } =>  {<a>  <b>  "foo"@en . }
>>
>
> No.
>
>
>>
>> Q21. {<a>  <b>  "foo"@en . } =>  {<a>  <b>  "foo" . }
>>
>
> No.
>
>
>>
>> Q22. {<a>  <b>  "foo"@en . } =>  {<a>  <b>  "foo"@en-GB . }
>>
>
> No.
>
>
>>
>> Q23. {<a>  <b>  "foo"@en-GB . } =>  {<a>  <b>  "foo"@en . }
>>
>
> No.
>
>
>>
>> Q24. {<a>  <b>  "foo"@fr . } =>  {<a>  <b>  "foo"@en . }
>>
>
>
> No.
>
> -Alex
>


-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
Researcher at:
Laboratoire d'InfoRmatique en Image et Systèmes d'information
Database Group
7 Avenue Jean Capelle
69621 Villeurbanne Cedex
France
Tel: +33(0)4 72 43 61 74 - Fax: +33(0)4 72 43 87 13
Lecturer at:
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
20 Avenue Albert Einstein
69621 Villeurbanne Cedex
France
antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 14:51:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:42 GMT