W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 12:48:16 +0100
Cc: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A176D110-7296-4FAE-A835-BA76B59C1F1F@cyganiak.de>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
On 17 May 2011, at 23:31, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> why not consider language tags as special datatypes?
>> In other words,
>> 
>> "chat"@en
>> 
>> would be a shortcut for something like
>> 
>> "chat"^^rdflang:en
>> 
>> (even if the above notation could be forbidden in serialization
>> syntaxes, alla rdf:PlainLiteal)
> 
> What are the value space and L2V mapping of this datatype? 

Let's recall that in the current semantics, the interpretation of "xxx"@en is a pair of a Unicode string "xxx" and a language tag "en".

So the value space of rdflang:en could be the same: pairs <xxx, en> of unicode strings and the language tag "en".

> This would imply that "chat"@en is not a string, right? 

Correct, just like in the current semantics.

Best,
Richard
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 11:48:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:42 GMT