W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

RDF-ISSUE-46 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent?" [Cleanup tasks]

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 01:19:58 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QH4HO-0002Ro-Cv@stu.w3.org>

RDF-ISSUE-46 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent?" [Cleanup tasks]

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/46

Raised by: David Wood
On product: Cleanup tasks

See http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
rdf-equivalent-uri's: Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two
uri's to be equivalent?

RESOLVE: Closed, owl provides owl:sameAs already.

Pierre-Antoine wishes to continue discussion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0339.html

NB: The Charter allows us to "Update and extend the RDF Primer. New features may include multi-syntax examples, more up-to-date in terms of the vocabularies used, may deal with issues around Linked Data like the use of “owl:sameAs”, the “follow-your-nose” algorithm, etc."
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:19:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:42 GMT