- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:43:56 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- CC: Yves Raimond <Yves.Raimond@bbc.co.uk>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
>>>
>>> Maybe that happens by something "#" part
>>>
>>> { "#" : { "@gen": "http://company.com/employee/${name}", .. }
>>
>> Or rather { "#" : { "@gen":
>> "http://company.com/employee/${employeeId}", .. }
>>
>> Anyway, a definite +1!
>
> Likewise, and as per second half of:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Feb/0086.html
I'm not claiming it's novel.
It is a transformation that is not to do with vocabulary so you can't
just add a vocabulary pointer to existing data. It is tied to the data
publisher and if it's a link, should link to something. Data publishers
do often care a lot about IRIs minted to name their data.
Andy
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 15:44:36 UTC