W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: SPARQL comments

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:11:22 -0400
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <79DE34B2-E45A-4249-AAEA-B32B51A8CF2C@3roundstones.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
On Jun 8, 2011, at 09:44, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 08/06/11 01:31, David Wood wrote:
>> I have heard that the SPARQL WG is not particularly interested in
>> addressing substantive comments.
> Really?

Yes, but that doesn't mean the comments I have heard are authoritative.


> SPARQL-WG is in Last Call.  I can't speak for the group, but I, for one, take comments seriously.
> (Someone (here at SemTech) has wondered why it takes the WG (any WG) so long to respond to comments but it is because it is a group-agreed response, not an individual response from an editor which was their impression.)
> 	Andy
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 15:11:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:59 UTC