- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:29:01 -0400
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I'd prefer to open a new issue that is bounded to just language-tagged strings, if that is acceptable to others. Regards, Dave On Jul 21, 2011, at 07:57, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > I'm going through the RDF Concepts draft, matching the To-Do's and @@@'s with the tracker. > > It appears that ISSUE-12, which is linked from the draft, has been closed. I think it's been closed in error. We had a resolution [2] on ISSUE-12, but the accepted proposal [3] states: > > “4. This proposal does not consider what ought to be done about language-tagged strings or rdf:PlainLiteral; these questions are to be addressed in a separate proposal and decision” > > I read this as stating that the issue should remain open till some decision has been made about the other kinds of literals. So I'm re-opening ISSUE-12. (We could raise a new issue too if someone feels that would be better.) > > Best, > Richard > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/12 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-06-15 > [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/StringLiterals/AbolishUntaggedPlain > >
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 17:29:30 UTC