W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12 language-tagged literals

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:36:23 +0100
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <F06CF533-9E7F-4484-9916-1703FD0999F2@cyganiak.de>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
On 16 Jul 2011, at 16:52, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> I'd rather make DATATYPE("foo"@en) be honest and say that it returns datatype rdf:LangString.

You cannot do so without a hack.

Assuming you want to do that, the only question is whether that hack goes into the RDF spec or into the SPARQL spec.

I think it should go into the SPARQL spec.

Assuming that the rdf:PlainLiteral spec gets updated along the lines I suggested in [1], then that hack would even be nicely consistent with OWL and RIF.

If we put the hack into RDF, then the updated rdf:PlainLiteral spec would have to become a hack on top of another hack, and it would make it harder to get buy-in for updating that spec.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jul/0048.html
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 18:36:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:00 UTC