W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: [Turtle] spec minutia

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:31:02 +0100
Message-ID: <4E21AEB6.8040605@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org

On 15/07/11 17:17, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> == RDF URI Reference ==
> "RDF URI Reference" still shows up in three places. Should we change it
> to IRI or wait for the RDF model spec to evolve? The same goes for
> datatype URI which I assume will evolve towards an IRI.

Slightly different - "RDF URI Reference" is a specific RDF term which 
we're changing.  A datatype URI is a normal URI.

> == Base URI ==
> Is "Base URI" such a universal concept that I should be hesitant about
> s/Base URI/Base IRI/? (Note, this impacts grammar and definition.)

Uniformly using "IRI" seems to me to be better.

A para of text somewhere at the beginning of concepts, explaining this 
woudl be helpful but, as a spec, I think we should use be uniofrm and 
use the same, correct term everywhere.

"RDF URI Reference" is a precursor for IRI.

Received on Saturday, 16 July 2011 15:31:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:00 UTC