- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pchampin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:49:43 +0100
- To: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
May be I typed a little too fast my last statement about APIs -- should be in bed anyway... :-/ On 02/25/2011 12:21 AM, Nathan wrote: > So, do we focus on giving people a way to view simple objects as RDF, or > focus on trying to get them to forget simple objects and work with RDF > via APIs, or try and provide RDF in such a way that you don't always > need APIs and can work with it as if it's objects? > > My general contention is that only the first two of those options will > lead to any measurable success / adoption, and I'm reading that you're > suggesting the third option (?) No, I don't think so. I guess I was rather suggesting the second one and neglecting the first one, about which I have to give more thought. pa
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 23:50:13 UTC