W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Re: [JSON] Initial comments

From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pchampin@liris.cnrs.fr>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:49:43 +0100
Message-ID: <4D66EE97.6030309@liris.cnrs.fr>
To: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>
CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
May be I typed a little too fast my last statement about APIs -- should 
be in bed anyway... :-/

On 02/25/2011 12:21 AM, Nathan wrote:
> So, do we focus on giving people a way to view simple objects as RDF, or
> focus on trying to get them to forget simple objects and work with RDF
> via APIs, or try and provide RDF in such a way that you don't always
> need APIs and can work with it as if it's objects?
>
> My general contention is that only the first two of those options will
> lead to any measurable success / adoption, and I'm reading that you're
> suggesting the third option (?)

No, I don't think so. I guess I was rather suggesting the second one and 
neglecting the first one, about which I have to give more thought.

   pa
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 23:50:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:38 GMT