- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:52:41 -0600
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Dec 19, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 19 Dec 2011, at 10:48, Pat Hayes wrote: >> I would like to see some evidence, from actual use cases, of how it can be that different RDF graphs hold in different contexts, > > See here for some (toy) examples: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Oct/0212.html For comments on that, see my reply http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Oct/0228.html > A list of use cases provided by WG members is on the wiki: > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC After a quick survey, I dont see anything in this list which suggests that a context can or should be thought of as changing the meaning of an IRI. > > Many of the use cases ask for context information about RDF graphs in order to decide wether to accept a graph as true. Yes, quite. But not to change the meaning of the graph or of the IRIs in the graph. Am I missing something? Pat ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 03:53:19 UTC