W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: dataset semantics

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:52:41 -0600
Cc: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <F2C0E910-FE77-4634-869C-4AE58FB2D336@ihmc.us>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>

On Dec 19, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2011, at 10:48, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> I would like to see some evidence, from actual use cases, of how it can be that different RDF graphs hold in different contexts,
> 
> See here for some (toy) examples:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Oct/0212.html

For comments on that, see my reply 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Oct/0228.html

> A list of use cases provided by WG members is on the wiki:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC

After a quick survey, I dont see anything in this list which suggests that a context can or should be thought of as changing the meaning of an IRI. 

> 
> Many of the use cases ask for context information about RDF graphs in order to decide wether to accept a graph as true.

Yes, quite. But not to change the meaning of the graph or of the IRIs in the graph. 

Am I missing something?

Pat


------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 03:53:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT